Now also, in the manner of this XKCD cartoon
that summarizes the ongoing delays for another project, the James Webb Space Telescope, we offer a retrospective of the promised milestone date for the substantial completion of electrification, which gives a pretty good eyeball of where PCEP will end up:
Monthly updates will be added here as they occur.
The FTA Perspective:
The May 2020 PCEP quarterly monitoring report from the FTA PMOC
provides some refreshing independent views of the project. The PMOC contractor evidently prepared this report as if it were their last quarterly monitoring report (it wasn't) and included a special Appendix I, a final summary of issues, hurdles, and lessons learned. This is a must-read.
For a northbound cab view of the corridor construction as it stood on July 18th, 2020, see this video
by YouTube user Flat Train.
Notes from the April 2021 PCEP progress report
We are seeing an odd divergence of foundation and pole installation rates: only one pole was installed for the entire month, despite hundreds of foundations being ready for poles. Foundation
installation is at 77% and poles at 60%. For EMU car shells, 59% have
shipped from Switzerland.
The big schedule and budget update / re-baseline is again delayed, at least to July. There was a three-week slip in Segment 4, and a three-month slip in completion of the CEMOF work (not anywhere near the critical path). FTA independent oversight (PMOC) reports continue to be delayed, with the December 2020 report nowhere to be seen and the March 2021 report still in draft.
Notes from the March 2021 PCEP progress report
Foundations are picking up a bit, but poles are oddly lagging since there are roughly 800 completed foundations awaiting poles. Foundation installation is at 74% and poles at 60%. For EMU car shells, 56% have shipped from Switzerland.
The critical path has once again flip-flopped to the EMU contract, as we await a major schedule update now set for the June board meeting. Notable slips in the Appendix C program schedule include segment 1 overhead contact system (2 months), segment 4 testing (almost 3 months!), and large slips in EMU deliveries (up to 5 months). These big slips are overshadowed by signal work in segments 1 and 3, which haven't started yet and are slated for a lightning-fast installation of ~10 months each. We know from painful experience that signal work in segments 2 and 4 is taking over 30 months, so there may be a future ~20 month slip hiding under there if the work in segments 1 and 3 turns out to be similarly complex and drawn out. Also notable is the zero duration of segment testing for segments 1, 2 and 3. Overall signs still point to no sooner than 2024 for the first passenger service with EMUs.
Notes from the February 2021 PCEP progress report
New schedule slips reported this month change nothing to the overall trends for the project, which have held steady for a long time. Based on trend extrapolation in the graphs above, foundations are likely to complete in fall 2022 (a year later than reported by Caltrain) and the project will see passenger service no sooner than early 2024 (more than a year later than reported by Caltrain). The critical path has returned to the electrification contract. Notable slips in the Appendix C schedule include signal work, delayed by 2 months in every segment, and a 3-month slip to the PG&E interconnection to the traction power substation in South San Francisco, which will now be built underground.
If looking at a glass half-full, foundation installation is now at 71%, pole erection at 58%, and EMU car shell manufacture at 53%.
Notes from the January 2021 PCEP progress report
This month saw the completion of a grand total of 21 foundations and seven poles. The contractor appears to be slow-rolling the work as mediation continues. Caltrain still projects that all foundations will be completed this September, which is not remotely credible.
Notes from the December 2020 PCEP progress report
Another month, another slip. We learn in the schedule section that Caltrain and Balfour Beatty are engaged in a mediation process, which is the last stage before lawsuits fly. The substantial completion milestone has slipped again, maintaining the trend line plotted above that predicts the substantial completion milestone will realistically occur no sooner than November 2023, with RSD following around new year 2024.
Despite crowing about having completed all foundations in segments 3 (true) and 4 (not quite there yet: still 5 to go in 4B and 96 at CEMOF), the foundation installation rate remains pathetic with a monthly production of just 25 foundations versus 200 promised. Next month is promised at 206. Fool me once, ....
Appendix C schedule shows large slips in SCADA testing (3 months) and PG&E permanent power at the South San Francisco substation (7 months!) With permanent power available only by 4/15/22, testing of segments 1 and 2 will certainly be impacted, although you wouldn't know it because the segment testing tasks (sneakily renamed "segment completion" last October) currently have a duration of zero.
Notes from the November 2020 PCEP progress report
The project's revenue service date has now slipped beyond the FTA funding deadline. The critical path has shifted back to Stadler, at least in Caltrain's reporting. Here's the funny thing: when Stadler reports a schedule slip, the dates seem to get copied straight into Caltrain's program schedule; when Balfour Beatty reports a substantial completion date of June 2024, the dates are quickly swept under the carpet and replaced with made-up "forecast" dates in Caltrain's program schedule that will "likely change." Nothing on the BBII front has changed in Appendix C since last month, so maybe they are saving the big reveal for the new administration, which will presumably look upon the spilled milk with less vindictiveness than the current regime. In the meantime, a linear curve fit of the above charts strongly and steadily indicates a revenue service date in early 2024. Only three more years to go!
For fun, here's a brief video
from December 9th of a couple of Caltrain car shells on the road in Switzerland, where they are made. They are too tall and wide to go by rail.
Notes from the October 2020 PCEP progress report
Exactly as predicted, all scheduling tricks having been exhausted, the electrification work is now firmly on the schedule critical path. The substantial completion milestone just slipped 3 months to 7/22/2022, right up against the FTA revenue service demonstration (RSD) deadline. Looking back, this milestone has now slipped by over a year since late 2018. It would have blown past the RSD deadline had the schedulers not deleted the pre-revenue testing task, and it almost certainly will: the contractor's schedule shows substantial completion in June 2024, that's right, twenty twenty-four. If we extrapolate the past rate of slippage of Caltrain's substantial completion milestone (~0.54 month/month) and assume the slippage will continue at the same rate (because why wouldn't it?) the milestone will slip to, surprise, 2024.
Foundation production continues to be anemic, with a deceleration to 38/month versus 69 planned. Even at a promised rate of 200/month, the foundation completion has pushed out from March into May 2021 per Caltrain's dashboard metrics. Without this unsubstantiated acceleration to 200/month, a straight extrapolation of the recent production rate indicates foundation completion in October of 2022.
The Appendix C schedule remains extremely compressed against the RSD deadline, despite the wholesale deletion of the pre-revenue testing span. Segments 1 and 2 completion dates have slipped to May 2022, leaving almost no margin for system-level testing against the deadline. Clearly, the schedulers had to apply extreme contortions this month to prevent the appearance of missing the RSD deadline: what used to be "segment testing" with a non-zero duration (43 days in segment 1; 43 days in segment 2; 34 days in segment 3) has suddenly morphed into a "segment completion" milestone with zero duration. As integrators of complex systems well know, the greatest risk to a success-oriented green-light schedule occurs during testing, so reducing the segment testing spans to zero is quite the shenanigan!
Expect these segment testing spans to return after Caltrain finally runs out to tricks to pretend that they will meet the FTA RSD deadline. Given how compressed against the deadline the schedule already is, the reckoning should occur very soon. And what better time is there to ask for FTA forgiveness than during a force majeure pandemic?
Notes from the September 2020 PCEP progress report
The schedule slips continue, despite best efforts on the part of the schedulers to hide the difficulties being experienced by the project by holding major milestone dates. The start of phased revenue service is in a month for month slip, now 4/23/22, and the task has been compressed by a month. Had this compression not occurred, the program critical path would now run through segment 3 signals and (surprise!) the SCADA system, which just slipped by more than 3 months. Pre-revenue testing can't be delayed much more, so this is it. It will take some serious creativity to claim the full revenue service date of July 2022 can be held.
Foundation production is still in the basement at 48 for September versus 168 planned. The plan is now 69 next month (under-promise, over-deliver) then rising to a never-achieved 212/month for the remainder of construction. Look for the foundation completion date to slip again soon.
Other assorted schedule slips: real estate acquisition (for miscellaneous dribs and drabs up and down the corridor, slipped by ~8 months); traction power in segments 3 and 4 (slipped by ~3 months, the former now just days from the critical path). Oddly, the testing of segment 4 is now scheduled to complete before traction power is done, which seems like a broken dependency.
The top risk is still the dual speed check grade crossing warning system.
Notes from the August 2020 PCEP progress report
Another month, another slip. Electrification substantial completion is delayed by a month to 3/26/22, for a nine-month slip over the last 18 months. That's just a milestone, and the tasks leading up to it are even more dramatically delayed, with Segment 2 OCS slipping by a whopping seven months! All the electrification tasks are now jammed up against the extremely compressed segment testing, itself slipping and pushing out integrating testing and pre-revenue service by a month. To prevent electrification from exploding onto the primary critical path, heroic schedulers have cut down phased revenue service by a month. The real story here is the secondary critical path, which runs through delayed signaling installation, testing and cut-over activities... and yet these bars are colored a soothing shade of green. Look for these to blow up very soon, with a 3-month slip having just occurred in Segment 4, the one furthest along.
Foundation production continues to flounder at 49 for the month versus 161 promised. The laughable end-of-year completion milestone has slipped by 3 months, allowing the absurdly high future production rates to drop to the merely never-achieved value of 168/month. Six foundations appear to have been "unbuilt" since last month, with completed totals dropping in Segment 2 Work Areas 4 and 5. This may be a bookkeeping error, so the graph shows 1940 completed versus 1934 in the report. Overall, foundation installation is still trending towards completion in late 2021.
Notes from the July 2020 PCEP progress report
This month, as expected, a mere 40 foundations were installed versus a promise of 186. The promised numbers keep going up to maintain the pretense of finishing before year's end, with 299 foundations/month promised in October and November, over seven times the actual July rate. Detailed accounting is slightly complicated by the fresh inclusion this month of 86 foundations previously constructed outside PCEP scope for the South San Francisco and Hillsdale projects. Since the report doesn't state when these were completed, we spread them out over Jan-Jun 2020. Extrapolating at the current 3-month trailing average production rate, foundations will be completed in November 2021, almost a year behind the advertised schedule. The long-promised acceleration of foundation production is not reflected in monthly actual totals for 2020, which casts doubt on whether such an acceleration will ever materialize.
Budget burn rates for the various contracts are also consistent with a one-year delay, and that is before any pandemic impacts. The dashboards show an overall deceleration of spending, with the past 3 month average burn rate trailing the past 12 month average. Burn rate would now have to double to finish on time, which is plain to see just won't happen.
In the Appendix C schedule, there is a 7-month slip for traction power in Segment 1, and smaller slips in all the other segments. These slips remove all the slack that remained before electrification becomes the critical path. It's now a horse race (or snail race?) between Stadler and BBII.
Expect your first EMU ride in mid-2023.
Notes from the June 2020 PCEP progress report
The pandemic and the words "force majeure" are starting to make a more prominent appearance in the report, providing useful cover for Balfour Beatty's woeful schedule performance. A pandemic-related day-for-day slip at Stadler continues to provide cover, under the theory that the schedule critical path still runs through EMU production-- a condition that remains true on paper only because the secondary critical path has been slashed to the bone by unreasonably compressing key testing and integration tasks at the very end of the program.
The dashboards in section 2.1 don't lie: to finish on time, Balfour would have to triple their burn rate from $5.7 million/month to $17.2 million/month. Overall, project spending is about $700 million behind plan, indicative of severe schedule under-performance. At current burn rates, PCEP will finish no earlier than mid-2023, close to a year behind the dates currently being promised.
Foundation production for June was promised 71 / actual 105, a rare over-performance. Now do July, when an unprecedented 186 foundations were promised. As of this report, the foundations are 56% installed, and poles are 44% installed.
As of this writing in August, 2020, none of the quarterly FTA PMOC
oversight reports for 2020 have been posted by Caltrain. These usually
provide an unsparing look at the internal challenges of the program, but
with election season approaching there is surely a rising incentive to keep them out of the public eye.
Notes from the May 2020 PCEP progress report
Foundation production, despite the insistent promises of past months, has crashed
back to the dismal level of 44/month. Undeterred, project managers
project ever higher and unachievable future rates (nearly 300
foundations are planned for November) in order to finish within the
current calendar year.
For the EMUs, a new change order was
approved to defer the installation of interior wheelchair lifts, the
final nail in the coffin of the high/low boarding solution. Platform
interface-wise, the EMUs will now be configured exactly the same way as
the existing Bombardier cars. While recent photos from Salt Lake City
show the upper doors installed, these will soon be removed and replaced
by plug panels.
In a bit of good news, the regulatory compliance
documentation for EMU crashworthiness has been approved by FRA, which
is no small feat. One hopes sufficient spares of fiberglass front
cladding have been ordered to withstand the usual grade crossing
The pandemic has delayed testing of the first trainset
in Salt Lake City, such that its trip to Pueblo, Colorado for dynamic
testing is delayed to November and slipping day for day.
milestone schedule has slipped again, with electrification substantial
completion delayed to 2/26/2022, a slip of 8 months since late 2018.
Revenue service has slipped 2.5 months to late July 2022, all but
eliminating the margin against FTA's deadline of August 2022. The
pandemic will surely be invoked to delay the deadline.
still claimed to be on the critical path, now with a convenient
day-for-day pandemic slip that provides a welcome fig leaf to the
Balfour Beatty electrification work.
The Appendix C schedule
finally shows signal construction work. Notably, this work has pushed
out the testing of segments 1, 2 and 3 by up to 8 months, with
compressed testing tasks taking place at the end of 2021. The testing of
the entire electrification system has been compressed from ~6 months to
less than 3 months. Pre-revenue testing has been further curtailed to
six weeks. There is no discussion or justification of this extremely
sporty schedule compression, other than it maintains the illusion that
the critical path runs through Stadler.
In the risk list, three
new risks have appeared to justify what is surely the consequence of Buy
America procurement for the EMUs: quality issues, failed factory tests, and poor
integration and control of new U.S. suppliers. These seem to be clear
and present issues, rather than risks.
Notes from the April 2020 PCEP progress report
installation recovered a bit, and an explicit (if likely unachievable)
plan was published for how many foundations would have to be completed
in each of the remaining months of 2020 in order to finish within the
Shipping the first train to Colorado (for high-speed
testing) continues to be delayed. This is an important "schedule hold
point" where contingency budgets are re-evaluated, and we are now 14
months into a 19-month gap that has opened in the sequence of schedule
Speaking of contingency, $32 million of it was used
this month alone, of which $25 million was shoveled over to PG&E for
interconnection work. Why was the contingency budget not replenished by
the amount not paid to the party formerly on the hook to perform the
New risks: #321 if PG&E makes trouble about the
single-phase loading of their substations, then the system cannot be
energized. #322 if substations aren't completed on time to get powered
up, then testing will be delayed. And then the kicker: #323 "FRA
concerns require redesign".... don't leave us hanging, be specific!
it's the beginning of June and none of the FTA PMOC reports for 2020
have yet showed up. Who is slow-walking these important oversight
documents, the FTA or Caltrain?
Notes from the March 2020 PCEP progress report
installation continues to fall hopelessly behind. The average total for
the entire first quarter of 2020 was eight foundations per month (that's
right, you can count them on two hands!) and if that rate is sustained,
all foundations should be complete by the year 2036. Of course, the
report promises a significant acceleration, but the stated goal of
completing another 1544 foundations within nine months to support the
end-of-year foundation completion milestone has gone from ridiculous to
downright laughable. The board and public should be insulted by such a
dishonest status report, insisting that everything is on schedule. It's
okay to be late, but it's not okay to be so nakedly dishonest about it.
Notes from the February 2020 PCEP progress report
production for February is again ZERO, despite repeated affirmations
throughout the report that there is a schedule to finish everything by
the end of this year. The required average production rate to reach this
goal is 157/month (excluding foundations that are part of SSF and 25th
Ave projects); this is higher than the all-time record of 151 set in
November 2019. The likelihood of missing the end-of-year target is darn
near one hundred percent.
2) The Appendix C schedule shows
continuing month-for-month slips in the OCS and traction power tasks,
with the selective exception of the segment 1 OCS task-- which if
delayed would push the BBII work onto the critical path of the project.
To avoid this, the task duration was shortened, using a well-known
3) delivery of trainsets 2 and 3 is delayed
nine months and six months, respectively. That sure is a long time to
retrofit flip-up seats. Is there something else we aren't being told?
Notes from the January 2020 PCEP progress report
production is at ZERO for the month, with the rate required to complete
by the end of the year having increased from 131/month to 143/month. The
stated reason for zero foundations is because the contractor "did not
have the rebar cages", of which enormous stacks can plainly be observed
rusting away at Burlingame, Redwood Junction, and possibly other
locations. Something big has come up and Caltrain isn't being
transparent about it.
2) Schedule milestones are said not to have
budged, despite the latest FTA PMOC report (December 2019) stating that
the contractor's schedule shows a substantial completion date of
January 2024. That's right, twenty-twenty-FOUR.
3) The flip-up
seats that will be added to the bike cars are the subject of a change
order that costs $1.96 million, to buy 4 flip-up seats x 2 bike cars x
19 trainsets = $12,900 per flip-up seat. No word on what material these
are made of, but solid gold is not out of the question.
signal modifications and grade crossing Constant Warning Time tasks that
underlie the contractor's major schedule slips still do not appear on
Caltrain's tracking schedule. It's harder to track the progress of a
task when it isn't even on your schedule.
5) The appendix C
schedule shows a wave breaking in EMU deliveries, with early deliveries
delayed by ~3 months and later-produced trainsets being delivered before
the earlier-produced trainsets. Must be those flip up seats and door
Notes from the December 2019 PCEP progress report
production has faltered again. The goal posts stayed put this month, but
the production rate required to complete by the end of this year has
increased from 124/month to 131/month. This month: just 44.
appendix C schedule shows a large slip in SCADA (six months!) leaving
just 1 month of slack before pre-revenue testing begins. This is shaping
up to be yet another secondary critical path. Meanwhile, the completion
of traction power construction in segments 1, 2 and 3 is in a
month-for-month slip even after the large schedule slips recorded in
last month's update. The tsunami buildup continues.
On the good
news front: production photos posted on calmod.com appear to show that
the door to the EMU cab compartment will have a railfan window affording
a view into the cab and out the front of the train. Train nerds
Notes from the November 2019 PCEP progress report
production has accelerated to a record monthly total of 151, but the
goalpost for target monthly average has moved again from 8/31/2020 out
to 12/31/2020 (four months). For the old target of 8/31/2020, the
required monthly productivity would have been 179 foundations/month.
With the newly relaxed milestone it is 124 foundations/month.
Appendix C schedule continues to show "tsunami buildup" where a wave of
delayed tasks compresses against an artificially held RSD milestone.
Most notably, electrification system testing (schedule line 41) has
compressed from 222 days to 183 days (18% shorter) and phased revenue
service (schedule line 83) has compressed from 90 days to 69 days (23%
3) The date when you will be able to board an EMU as a
passenger for the first time (i.e. the beginning of phased revenue
service) has slipped by a month to February 1st, 2022.
the critical path is still stated to go through vehicle manufacturing,
ten EMUs will have been delivered by the start of phased revenue
service. Is ten enough to begin phased revenue service? If so, EMU
manufacturing isn't your critical path.
As observed with last
month's notes, Caltrain is making increasingly desperate schedule
modifications to maintain the appearance that electrification is not on
the primary critical path. With reality biting, it is doubtful they will
be able to keep this up for more than a couple of months longer. Expect
fireworks by March or April 2020 board meeting.
Speaking of fireworks, Happy New Year 2020 to transit nerds everywhere!
Notes from the October 2019 PCEP progress report
2-5 (foundation production) shows a monthly target for the production
rate required to meet the schedule. This monthly target has been stuck
at 174 since they started publishing this metric, which is an error in
whatever spreadsheet they are using to make this chart. The correctly
calculated numbers for the last 5 months (foundations-to-go divided by
months left) are: 174, 178, 191, 198, 221. In this latest report they
moved the goalpost from 6/30/2020 to 8/31/2020, which bought them an
extra two months but used up the schedule slack. By that metric, we're
back to 1766 to go divided by 10 months = 177. Hopefully this error will
be corrected in future reports.
2) The contractor has never
reached 177 foundations/month. To date the record is November 2019,
reportedly at 151. (Interestingly, even this record would further bump
up the rate to complete from 177 to 179.) This figure of 179 would have
to be sustained without interruption until completion. Given that on
average, the more difficult foundations (where conflicts are found with
existing utilities such as Caltrain's very own PTC fiber optic cables)
are being delayed and left to be addressed later than the low hanging
fruit, it will become increasingly difficult to maintain rate 179.
In the Appendix C schedule, OCS completion has just slipped by one
month for three out of the four segments. OCS completion in segment 1
(San Francisco) is now on a secondary critical path, followed
immediately by segment testing and system testing. The only reason this
didn't become the primary critical path this month is that they
compressed system testing by one month, holding the end of system
testing at 12/31/21. Compression of testing periods is a red flag.
In the Appendix C schedule, the logic is constructed such that it is
necessary to have 14 EMUs on hand by the end of "phased revenue testing"
which means service is operated with a mix of diesels and EMUs. This is
what makes the critical path go through EMU production. In reality,
what is most important is the *beginning* of phased revenue testing,
which is when you will be able to board an EMU for the first time. Right
now this milestone is at 1/3/2022 and has zero slack (i.e. it is on the
5) The latest PMOC report (September 2019)
reveals that the contractor's working schedule (so far rejected by
Caltrain for various reasons) predicts substantial completion of
electrification on 7/4/2022, six months later than carried in the
Appendix C schedule or 12/31/2021.
I expect Caltrain to make
increasingly desperate modifications to the program schedule, including
further compression of the system test period, to maintain for as long
as possible the appearance that electrification is not on the primary
critical path. Let's see how long they can obfuscate before finally